LEADER 04306cam a2200577 i 4500001 263527 005 20240621232031.0 008 960725s2018 nyu b 000 0 eng 010 2017054997 019 1007079845 020 9781479887712 |qhardcover |qalkaline paper 020 1479887714 |qhardcover |qalkaline paper 020 9781479857838 |qpaperback |qalkaline paper 020 1479857831 |qpaperback |qalkaline paper 035 (OCoLC)on1007088516 035 263527 042 pcc 043 n-us--- 049 LHMA 040 DLC |beng |erda |cDLC |dOCLCO |dOCLCF |dYDX |dOCLCO |dGUB |dUCX |dCHVBK |dOCLCO |dCLU |dPLL |dLHM 050 00 KF9345 |b.D43 2018 100 1 Delgado, Richard, |eauthor. 245 10 Must we defend Nazis? : |bwhy the First Amendment should not protect hate speech and White supremacy / |cRichard Delgado & Jean Stefancic. 264 1 New York : |bNew York University Press, |c[2018] 300 xv, 164 pages ; |c21 cm 336 text |btxt |2rdacontent 337 unmediated |bn |2rdamedia 338 volume |bnc |2rdacarrier 504 Includes bibliographical references. 505 0 The harms of hate speech -- Hate speech on campus -- Hate in cyberspace -- Neoliberal arguments against hate speech regulation -- Neoconservative arguments against hate-speech regulation -- How do other nations handle this problem? -- A guide for activist lawyers and judges -- "The speech we hate" : the romantic appeal of First Amendment absolutism. 520 "Swirling in the midst of the resurgence of neo-Nazi demonstrations, hate speech, and acts of domestic terrorism are uncomfortable questions about the limits of free speech. The United States stands apart from many other countries in that citizens have the power to say virtually anything without legal repercussions. But, in the case of white supremacy, does the First Amendment demand that we defend Nazis? In Must We Defend Nazis?, legal experts Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic argue that it should not. Updated to consider the white supremacy demonstrations and counter-protests in Charlottesville and debates about hate speech on campus and on the internet, the book offers a concise argument against total, unchecked freedom of speech. Delgado and Stefancic instead call for a system of free speech that takes into account the harms that hate speech can inflict upon disempowered, marginalized people. They examine the prevailing arguments against regulating speech, and show that they all have answers. They also show how limiting free speech would work in a legal framework and offer suggestions for activist lawyers and judges interested in approaching the hate speech controversy intelligently. As citizens are confronting free speech in contention with equal dignity, access, and respect, Must We Defend Nazis? puts aside clichés that clutter First Amendment thinking, and presents a nuanced position that recognizes the needs of our increasingly diverse society." -- Publisher's website. 591 Record updated by Marcive processing 21 June 2024 610 10 United States. |tConstitution. |n1st Amendment. 630 07 Constitution (United States) |2fast |0(OCoLC)fst01356075 650 0 Hate speech |xLaw and legislation |zUnited States. 650 0 Freedom of speech |zUnited States. 650 0 Nazis. 650 0 White supremacy movements. 650 7 Freedom of speech. |2fast |0(OCoLC)fst00934044 650 7 Hate speech |xLaw and legislation. |2fast |0(OCoLC)fst01909650 650 7 Nazis. |2fast |0(OCoLC)fst01035219 650 7 White supremacy movements. |2fast |0(OCoLC)fst01174715 651 7 United States. |2fast |0(OCoLC)fst01204155 650 7 Meinungsfreiheit. |2gnd |0(DE-588)4038463-9 650 7 Rechtsradikaler. |2gnd |0(DE-588)4325758-6 651 7 USA. |2gnd |0(DE-588)4078704-7 650 7 Hate speech. |2homoit 700 1 Stefancic, Jean, |eauthor. 775 08 |iRevision of:Delgado, Richard. |tMust we defend Nazis? |dNew York : New York University Press, ©1997 |z0814718582 |w(DLC) 96025368 |w(OCoLC)35172518 856 |uhttps://www.law.upenn.edu/library/about-the-library/collections/bookplates/ |zPurchased with: Thomas McGrew Memorial Library Fund. 852 0 |bstacks |hKF9345 |i.D43 2018