LEADER 03218cam a2200421 i 4500001    276868
005    20240621234349.0
006    m     o  d        
007    cr bn|||||||||
008    111102t20102010dcua    ob    000 0 eng d
035    (OCoLC)ocn759402244
035    276868
049    LHMA
040    AWC |beng |erda |cAWC |dOCLCQ |dOCLCF |dOCL |dOCLCQ |dLHM
050  4 KZ6515
099    COMPUTER FILE
100 1  Giffen, Alison.
245 10 Addressing the doctrinal deficit : |bdeveloping guidance to prevent and respond to widespread or systematic attacks against civilians : a workshop report / |cby Alison Giffen.
264  1 Washington, DC : |bHenry L. Stimson Center, |c2010.
264  4  |c©2010
300    1 online resource (57 pages) : |billustrations
336    text |btxt |2rdacontent
337    computer |bc |2rdamedia
338    online resource |bcr |2rdacarrier
340     |gmonochrome |2rdacc
347    text file |2rdaft
500    "Spring 2010."
500    Report from an international experts workshop, 21-24 September 2009, UK Defence Academy, Shrivenham, United Kingdom.
520    In the late 20th century, military operations and the governments and institutions that authorized them proved unable or unwilling to stop atrocities that unfolded around them in Rwanda and the Former Yugoslavia. Following these failures, world leaders undertook efforts to develop international capacity and to reform laws and institutions to prevent and respond to such crises. Over the last decade the world has witnessed a growing number of military operations tasked with protecting civilians from systematic and widespread atrocities. Yet these more recent efforts have also struggled to provide the protection that is expected of them. After more than ten years of experience, why are military operations still struggling to effectively protect civilians? Recent doctrine has fallen short in providing guidance on how to go about protecting civilians, leaving it to those planning and implementing such operations to develop the conceptual approaches required to turn ambition into reality as they go. Such an ad hoc approach has resulted in operations without the strategies, preparation, resources, and assets to cope with protection crises. This workshop sought to address questions related to this doctrinal gap.
504    Includes bibliographical references.
505 0  Introduction. The doctrinal gap -- An initial step to address the doctrinal deficit -- Scope of the workshop report and the concept of protection -- Addressing gray areas : findings drawn from workshop proceedings. The application of the military component to protect civilians -- Prioritizing protection -- Managing risks and consequences : thresholds of capability and consent -- Conclusion : unanswered questions and next steps.
591    Record updated by Marcive processing 21 June 2024
650  0 War |xProtection of civilians |vCongresses.
650  0 Military doctrine |vCongresses.
655  7 Conference papers and proceedings. |2lcgft
710 2  Henry L. Stimson Center.
856 40  |uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep10887 |zJSTOR open access
852     |ber