Advanced Search

Learn About The Holocaust

Special Collections

My Saved Research

Login

Register

Help

Skip to main content

A most uncertain crusade : the United States, human rights and the United Nations, 1941-1954 / by Rowland M. Brucken.

Publication | Digitized | Library Call Number: JC571 .B7635 1999

Search this record's additional resources, such as finding aids, documents, or transcripts.

No results match this search term.
Check spelling and try again.

results are loading

0 results found for “keyward

    Overview

    Summary
    This dissertation examines American human rights policy during World War II and in United Nations debates aver the drafting of an international bill of rights. By endorsing the Atlantic Charter and the, Declaration by the United Nations, the Roosevelt administration proclaimed that the world-wide protection of political and economic rights was a central war aim. Only if nations fol1owed a human code of conduct toward their own citizens, Roosevelt believed, could peace and stability return to a war-torn world. British and Soviet objections and Roosevelt's own changing postwar vision, though, caused the State Department to weaken its human rights proposals. Only pressure by U.S. non-governmental organizations and Latin American states forced Roosevelt to retreat. The United Nations Charter called upon member nations to “promote universal respect for, and observance of human rights” and to create a Human Rights Commission (UNCHR) that would draft the world's first, bill of rights. The Truman administration supported a conservative human rights agenda at the United Nations. By December 1948, the UN had completed a non-binding human rights declaration and a cautiously-worded Genocide Convention. The UNCHR next began to draft a binding covenant, of civil and political rights. In all three endeavors, the State Department sought to incorporate American legal norms and weak enforcement mechanisms to protect domestic segregation and disenfranchisement laws. By 1950, this narrowly-conceived policy had generated an international and domestic back-lash. A growing bloc of underdeveloped nations, over U.S. objections, attached economic guarantees and the right of self-determination to the covenant. Domestically, isolationist-oriented senators, led by John Bricker (R-OH) and join by the American Bar Association, charged that the Genocide Convention and the covenant would aver urn parts of the U.S. Constitution and spread socialism. They proposed a constitutional amendment to limit the legal impact of human rights treaties. Though the amendment failed to pass, Bricker's supporters forced President Dwight Eisenhower to stop work on the covenant. Eisenhower subsequently began a short-lived propaganda campaign Soviet human rights abuses. U.S. human rights policy now returned to its WWII focus on vague, politicized rhetoric.
    Format
    Book
    Author/Creator
    Brucken, Rowland M.
    Published
    1999
    Locale
    United States
    Notes
    Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 1999.
    Includes bibliographical references (p. 413-442).
    Photocopy. Ann Arbor, Mich. : UMI Dissertation Services, 2002. 22 cm.
    Dissertations and Theses

    Physical Details

    Language
    English
    Additional Form
    Electronic version(s) available internally at USHMM.
    Physical Description
    viii, 442 p.

    Keywords & Subjects

    Record last modified:
    2018-05-22 11:47:00
    This page:
    https:​/​/collections.ushmm.org​/search​/catalog​/bib69985

    Additional Resources

    Librarian View

    Download & Licensing

    • Terms of Use
    • This record is digitized but cannot be downloaded online.

    In-Person Research

    Availability

    Contact Us