Advanced Search

Learn About The Holocaust

Special Collections

My Saved Research

Login

Register

Help

Skip to main content

The rhetoric of resistance and the resistance to theory : controversial academic scholarship in the American public sphere / by Matthew Abraham.

Publication | Digitized | Library Call Number: LC72.2 .A27 2003

Search this record's additional resources, such as finding aids, documents, or transcripts.

No results match this search term.
Check spelling and try again.

results are loading

0 results found for “keyward

    Overview

    Summary
    “The Rhetoric of Resistance and the Resistance to Theory: Controversial Academic Scholarship in the American Public Sphere,” builds a reception theory that accounts for the ways in which scholarship that advances the perspectives of marginalized groups is configured and corrupted within our general culture.Through an analysis of the 1993 Lani Guinier nomination controversy, the 1986 Edward Said-Michael Walzer debate over the interpretations of Walzer's Exodus and Revolution, and the relatively recent attempts to malign Norman G. Finkelstein's A Nation on Trial: The Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth and The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering; I assess the socio-political forces that condition the American public sphere's understanding of academic work that touches upon sensitive issues concerning the past and present oppression of ethnic minorities. Through the Paul de Man controversy, I assess the political conditions that may have contributed to de Man's journalistic collaboration, as well as the ways in which figures who contribute critical strategies for minority critiques are often attacked within the American public sphere. Minority critiques often act as violent allergens.Coming to understand the important of these interventions and the “allergenic” reactions these interventions have induced may very well be the first step toward constructing a “rhetoric of dissent” for the twenty-first century. Such a rhetoric of dissent requires a re-visioning of the intellectual mission itself; a task that figures such as Guinier, Said, and Finkelstein have effectively performed. If we are to resist the dawning of a new age of intellectual orthodoxy, it will be important to look to the examples of critical intellectuals who have refused a gregarious and tolerant outlook for the way things are and to understand the strategies of dissent they provide.
    Format
    Book
    Author/Creator
    Abraham, Matthew, 1972-
    Published
    2003
    Locale
    United States
    Notes
    Thesis (Ph. D.)--Purdue University, 2003.
    Includes bibliographical references (p. 269-300).
    Photocopy. Ann Arbor, Mich. : UMI Dissertation Services, 2005. 22 cm.
    Dissertations and Theses

    Physical Details

    Language
    English
    Additional Form
    Electronic version(s) available internally at USHMM.
    Physical Description
    ix, 309 p.

    Keywords & Subjects

    Record last modified:
    2018-05-16 16:15:00
    This page:
    https:​/​/collections.ushmm.org​/search​/catalog​/bib103945

    Additional Resources

    Librarian View

    Download & Licensing

    • Terms of Use
    • This record is digitized but cannot be downloaded online.

    In-Person Research

    Availability

    Contact Us