Advanced Search

Learn About The Holocaust

Special Collections

My Saved Research

Login

Register

Help

Skip to main content

Burning ashes : an anthropological study of intellectual and moral judgment in the Historians' Debate / by Regina M. Feldman.

Publication | Digitized | Library Call Number: DD256.48 .F45 1999

Search this record's additional resources, such as finding aids, documents, or transcripts.

No results match this search term.
Check spelling and try again.

results are loading

0 results found for “keyward

    Overview

    Summary
    This dissertation examines the formation of intellectual and moral judgment in the German Historikerstreit of 1986/87 from an anthropological perspective. The Debate focused on four themes: the singularity of the Holocaust, projects of historicization (that is efforts to integrate National Socialism into "normal" German history), German identity, and the Holocaust. Most explicit statements in the Debate dealt with the question of the singularity of the Holocaust; each following theme was subject to less explicit attention. This decline in attention correlates with the depth of meaning each has for German post-war society. I argue that the Historians' Debate was motivated by the theme that remained mostly latent in the Debate, the Holocaust, more precisely, the inability to work through the National Socialist past. The anthropological character of this study is due to three modes of investigation: first, the Debate is analyzed in the contexts of German culture and politics. Second, the Debate is investigated from the "stranger's point of view", thereby elaborates the unquestioned aspects of historical practice, in this instance, primarily the values which govern professional judgment. Third, anthropological analysis is critical and self-reflective. The central methodological tool for this analysis, the dialogical conception of the relationship between texts and contexts, also translates into the idea that the anthropological critic must try to come to terms with the "transferential" relationship between her/himself and the text. I also examine the Historians' Debate from the perspective of historiography, for example the workings of representation and silence in the Debate, and the perspective of an ethics of professional scholarship. From the perspective of an anthropology of science, German historians form a community in which intellectually legitimate and morally responsible scholarship is socially negotiated. I argue in favor of an ethics of historical practice which aims at expanding solidarity with the victims of the Holocaust and the many "others" in contemporary German society through empathy. The study ends with some thoughts on the possibilities of creating a "culture of inclusion" against the dangers of a premature closure of history.
    Format
    Book
    Author/Creator
    Feldman, Regina M.
    Published
    [Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 1999
    Locale
    Germany
    Notes
    Thesis (Ph. D.)--Case Western Reserve University, 1999.
    Includes bibliographical references (pages 326-349).
    Photocopy. Ann Arbor, Mich. : UMI Dissertation Services, 2000. 23 cm.
    Dissertations and Theses

    Physical Details

    Language
    English
    Additional Form
    Electronic version(s) available internally at USHMM.
    Physical Description
    xiii, 349 pages

    Keywords & Subjects

    Record last modified:
    2024-06-21 17:09:00
    This page:
    https:​/​/collections.ushmm.org​/search​/catalog​/bib43783

    Additional Resources

    Librarian View

    Download & Licensing

    • Terms of Use
    • This record is digitized but cannot be downloaded online.

    In-Person Research

    Availability

    Contact Us