Advanced Search

Learn About The Holocaust

Special Collections

My Saved Research

Login

Register

Help

Skip to main content

Nothing but this otherness : rape discourses in peace and war / by Carolyn J. Mee.

Publication | Digitized | Library Call Number: HV6558 .M44 1999

Search this record's additional resources, such as finding aids, documents, or transcripts.

No results match this search term.
Check spelling and try again.

results are loading

0 results found for “keyward

    Overview

    Summary
    This dissertation explores the nature of narratives that construct the crime of rape. My controlling question is: If we create meaning in language as I believe we do, why have recent revisions in the linguistic constructions of the crime, such as reforms in rape laws and in interpretive legal theories, failed to change the way we interpret rape discourses? Why, for example, are rape survivors' narratives suspect in very specific ways, as compared to robbery victims' narratives? I attempt to answer such questions as: How do rape discourses relate to the brute facts of violent crime? How do readers/listeners judge a rape survivor's testimony? How are rape laws interpreted and applied to the specifics of a case? The ultimate question is: Can discourse effect the prevention of future crime? To this end, I analyze the intersection of three streams of interpretive theory: post-structuralism, feminist theories of language, and legal theory including feminist approaches. In addition, Elaine Scarry's The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World, a highly interdisciplinary work, informs my analysis of the imbrication of rape and language. Two specific cases exemplify my theoretical position. The first is the case of Alexander Keaton, a Philadelphia man tried and convicted of rape and murder. Keaton's case demonstrates the discursive operations involved in investigating and prosecuting crimes of rape. The second case concerns the investigations and indictments surrounding accusations of mass rapes as acts of genocide in Bosnia. The two cases resonate in the reception of survivors' narratives, as well as in the absence of resolution. They contrast in that Keaton represents an individual acting out his misogyny in a free country during peacetime; on the other hand, Bosnian Serbs acted during war and under military orders designed to eradicate a nation by way of its women, its families, and its communities.
    Format
    Book
    Author/Creator
    Mee, Carolyn J.
    Published
    1999 Jan
    Locale
    United States
    Bosnia and Hercegovina
    Notes
    Thesis (Ph. D.)--Temple University, 1999.
    Includes bibliographical references (leaves 187-193).
    Photocopy. Ann Arbor, Mich. : UMI, 2002. ix, 227 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.
    Dissertations and Theses

    Physical Details

    Language
    English
    Additional Form
    Electronic version(s) available internally at USHMM.
    Physical Description
    ix, 227 leaves : ill.

    Keywords & Subjects

    Record last modified:
    2018-05-22 11:47:00
    This page:
    https:​/​/collections.ushmm.org​/search​/catalog​/bib71622

    Additional Resources

    Librarian View

    Download & Licensing

    • Terms of Use
    • This record is digitized but cannot be downloaded online.

    In-Person Research

    Availability

    Contact Us